Meeting_Body
PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE
JULY 15, 2026
Subject
SUBJECT: EASTSIDE TRANSIT CORRIDOR PHASE 2 PROJECT
Action
ACTION: APPROVE RECOMMENDATION
Heading
RECOMMENDATION
Title
CONSIDER:
A. RECEIVING AND FILING the Environmental Assessment (EA), in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), including the NEPA project mitigation measures for the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA), a 4.7-mile Initial Operating Segment to the City of Montebello;
B. APPROVING the EA’s 9-acre Maintenance and Storage Facility (MSF) Site 3 in the City of Commerce for the Board-selected Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA), a 4.7-mile Initial Operating Segment extension of the existing Metro E-Line, while maintaining the full nine-mile Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 with the Lambert Station in the City of Whittier as the terminus for the Project; and,
C. AMENDING the 2020 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) to reflect the Board-selected LPA for the E-Line Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project.
Issue
ISSUE
On May 27, 2026, Metro, in coordination with the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), released the Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project’s Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA), a 4.7-mile Initial Operating Segment (IOS) for future E-Line extension from East Los Angeles to the City of Montebello, per the NEPA guidelines. FTA is the NEPA Lead Agency, and Metro is the Project Sponsor for the EA. The full EA document was published on the Federal Register (www.federalregister.gov/ <https://www.federalregister.gov/>) and the Project website (www.metro.net/projects/eastside_phase2/ <https://www.metro.net/projects/eastside_phase2/>). The Executive Summary of the EA is included in Attachment A. The EA was available for a 30-day public review period through June 26, 2026. The EA identifies the Project IOS’s reasonably foreseeable environmental effects and provides NEPA project mitigation measures to reduce or avoid potentially adverse effects. These measures are generally similar or slightly modified compared to the Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program (MMRP) in the certified Final Environmental Impact Report (May 2024).
The Project is a Measure R and Measure M project that is included in the 2020 LRTP and the 2024-2050 Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). Board approval of the recommended actions is necessary to 1) update the Project LPA definition to include a new 9-acre MSF in the City of Commerce and associated NEPA project mitigation measures for inclusion in FTA’s NEPA decision document, and 2) amend the 2020 LRTP with the refined LPA and request an amendment for the refined Project description in the SCAG RTP/SCS updates.
Background
BACKGROUND
Since 2007, Metro has conducted extensive environmental reviews and outreach programs for the Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project (Project). This has included the Alternatives Analysis (AA) in 2007-2009, the original Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in 2014, technical studies for project refinements in 2015-2018, scoping for the Recirculated EIR in 2019, release of the Recirculated Draft EIR in June 2022, selection of the LPA in December 2022, and release of Final EIR with responses to a total of 301 submissions, which encompassed 958 comments received on the Recirculated Draft EIR. Throughout the process, Metro engaged and informed elected officials, agency staff (e.g., the Washington Coalition and other local, state, and federal partnering agencies), community stakeholders, and the general public of the status of the Project in each phase of the Project, including the progress of the environmental review process. At its May 2024 meeting, the Board approved the full 9-mile Project and certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR) under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), with an IOS from East Los Angeles to City of Montebello and a 39-acre Maintenance and Storage Facility (MSF) for E-Line systemwide operations in the City of Montebello. Specifically, construction of the 39-acre Montebello MSF site would have involved acquiring six industrial properties and the relocation of nine businesses that currently provide roughly 500 jobs.
The 9-mile Project area has about 722,000 residents and 274,000 employees, with projections indicating an 11% increase in population and a 25% increase in jobs by 2042. It will pass through densely populated, low-income, and transit-dependent communities. Approximately 119,759 residents within ½ mile of the stations are identified as disadvantaged or low-income. Of this group, 49% are minorities, and 15% are transit-dependent individuals living below the federal poverty level, according to the American Community Survey (2020). Additionally, per the May 2024 Final EIR, once fully built to the Lambert Station terminus, the 9-mile Project is expected to serve over 15,000 average weekday boardings, an increase of approximately 7,700 in daily transit ridership, and to reduce daily VMT by over 10,000 vehicle miles.
NEPA Process
The Board had previously directed staff in December 2022 to reinitiate the NEPA process to pursue federal funding for the LPA (IOS to Montebello). In May 2025, the FTA determined that the Project requires preparation of an EA for a publication of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). An EA is a concise document assessing the significance of the potential social, economic, and environmental impacts of a federal action on a project. If an EA finds that the action has no significant effect, or that impacts can be mitigated to a level below significance for the environment, it concludes with a FONSI.
Discussion
DISCUSSION
The EA evaluates the LPA (IOS to Montebello), identified in the Final EIR under CEQA, as the Build Alternative. As required by NEPA, a “No Build Alternative” is also evaluated in the EA. The Build Alternative would consist of 4.7 miles of new and reconfigured light rail transit extending the Metro E Line from the current terminus at Atlantic Boulevard/Pomona Boulevard to an at-grade terminal station in the City of Montebello. There would be one relocated underground Atlantic/Pomona station and three new stations, including the Atlantic Blvd/Whittier Blvd station (underground), the Commerce/Citadel station (underground), and the Greenwood Ave/Washington Blvd station (at-grade). Metro’s project team collaborated with the FTA to prepare the EA document and technical studies, Section 106 consultation with tribal and cultural resources, and prepared Categorical Exemptions for pre-construction surveys.
Project Design Refinements during the NEPA study
Metro continued advancing the project design to 30% Preliminary Engineering (PE) for the IOS, focusing on rightsizing MSF and other complex design elements (tunnels, cut-and-cover stations, cross passages, transition structures, at-grade crossings). The Metro project team completed pre-construction surveys (including 158 soil borings and 178 utility potholes), along with over 8,000 flyers for door-to-door distribution and digital eblasts to key stakeholders and surrounding communities. Metro’s project team met regularly with corridor cities, utility companies, and railroad companies on engineering design reviews and refinements, utility conflicts and adjustments, and first-last mile planning. Compared to the April 2024 Final EIR, the EA includes design adjustments to the Project’s IOS, such as three new MSF site options, modification of traffic circulation to improve safety on 3rd Street, and refinements to traffic circulation at the LPA’s Greenwood/Washington station area along Washington Boulevard in Montebello. Additionally, the frequency of operations during peak periods has changed from 5 minutes to 6 minutes to ensure safe operations for the E-Line through the Regional Connector.
In response to environmental considerations and feedback from corridor cities, property owners, and the general public concerning the extensive 39-acre MSF site, Metro proactively undertook a design refinement study to reduce property impacts and project footprint during the Preliminary Engineering phase (30% design). Metro conducted a targeted stakeholder outreach related to the MSF site.
The Montebello MSF site, as identified in the Final EIR, is designated for the storage and maintenance of up to 120 vehicles to support the full 9-mile rail extension to the City of Whittier and existing E-Line systemwide operations. The Montebello MSF site will necessitate the acquisition of six industrial properties that are currently engaged in active manufacturing and operations. Metro has revisited the fleet size and operating and maintenance requirements for the IOS and the existing E-Line system by fully utilizing any remaining capacity of our existing Metro yards, while keeping our environmental footprint for the MSF as small as possible.
For the 4.7-mile IOS, the EA evaluates all three opportunity sites for the MSF, including:
• MSF Site 1: Site 1 is a 25-acre site in the City of Montebello for maintenance and storage of up to 84 light rail vehicles and 204 employee parking stalls, located west of Vail Avenue, with mid-block yard lead tracks. MSF Site 1 and the associated aerial yard lead tracks would require full acquisition of five (5) industrial properties supporting nine (9) businesses, and partial acquisition of a parcel owned by AT&SF Railway (part of BNSF Railway).
• MSF Site 2: Site 2 is a 28-acre site in the City of Montebello for maintenance and storage of up to 84 light rail vehicles and 255 employee parking stalls, located between Yates Avenue and Vail Avenue with aerial yard lead tracks on Yates Avenue. Construction of MSF Site 2 would require the acquisition of two (2) large industrial buildings, one strip parcel owned by AT&SF Railway (part of BNSF Railway), one full acquisition of a property at the corner of Washington Boulevard and Yates Avenue, and additional partial acquisitions of two industrial properties along Yates Avenue for the lead tracks to the MSF site.
• MSF Site 3: Site 3 is a 9-acre site in the City of Commerce for maintenance and storage of up to 39 vehicles and 55 employee parking stalls, located south of Gayhart Street and east of Saybrook Avenue. Site 3 will suffice for the minimum fleet requirement of 12 vehicles to operate the IOS to Montebello and for additional storage needed for E-Line systemwide operations. Site 3 would utilize five (5) parcels already acquired to support tunnel boring operations per the Final EIR and the rail alignment transit structure from the tunnel to the aerial Light Rail Transit structure over Garfield Boulevard. After tunnel boring is finished, a permanent satellite yard can be built on these five parcels without displacing any additional businesses prior to construction of the MSF.
After completion of the MSF design refinement study, public release of the EA, completion of the public hearings and public comment period on the EA, the MSF Site 3 in the City of Commerce is recommended as it meets the fleet requirement for the IOS, does not require any new additional acquisitions or business relocations, reduces the number of acquisitions required for the IOS, avoids displacing an additional nine businesses employing approximately 500 jobs before the construction of a MSF, and it significantly reduces environmental and construction impacts on the Washington Boulevard corridor.
Summary of Environmental Effects
The EA discloses potential impacts to 16 broad categories of environmental resources per NEPA and identifies mitigation measures to reduce or avoid adverse effects. The EA identified that there would be no adverse effect related to the following environmental topics: air quality, economics, growth, land use and development, acquisitions and relocations, utilities, and visual resources and aesthetics.
The EA identified that the project would be a de minimis impact on Section 4(f) resources, indicating that it would not affect the features, attributes, or activities of the historic sites in the study area. The EA identified adverse effects associated with the operation and construction of the Build Alternative related to the following environmental topics: biological resources; community impacts; historic, archaeological, and tribal resources; geology, soils, and paleontological resources; hazardous materials; water resources; noise and vibration; safety and security; and transportation. Avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures were identified for these resources, and, as described in the EA, the Build Alternative would have no adverse effect on them with the implementation of the NEPA project mitigation measures. National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 consultation efforts require the federal lead agency, FTA, to continue coordination with SHPO in Summer 2026 for the Project, to obtain concurrence and a determination that the project would not adversely affect historic properties. The results will be documented in the final NEPA document, with responses to comments received on the EA during the 30-day public review period, and FONSI, anticipated in Fall 2026.
Project Benefits
According to the EA, the IOS is expected to serve approximately 7,550 total daily weekday station boardings by 2050, an increase of 4,050 daily transit riders. This estimated ridership in the EA is lower than that presented in the Final EIR due to changes in regional and local travel patterns resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2024 SCAG current economic forecasts. The IOS would ease traffic congestion by reducing daily vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by over 8,000. Construction of the IOS is anticipated to create over 11,600 new jobs (construction, operations, maintenance, service) for Los Angeles County, with local hiring, and approximately $3.1 billion in additional economic activity beyond the direct construction spending for the region. Operation-related spending for the IOS is expected to generate an additional $2.2 million annually for employment opportunities for the region.
EA Notifications
Metro utilized a multi-channel, multilingual outreach strategy to maximize public awareness and participation during the NEPA Environmental Assessment review period. Consistent with Metro's community engagement strategy, opportunities for participation were provided through in-person meetings, virtual meetings, public hearings, stakeholder briefings, community-based organizations, pop-up events, direct outreach, and digital engagement platforms.
The Notice of Availability (NOA) for the EA was filed with the California State Clearinghouse and the Los Angeles County Clerk and mailed to the public and responsible agencies, organizations, elected officials, property owners, and other interested parties. Metro notified the public of the EA’s release and opportunities to provide public comment through various means in English and Spanish, including notifications to properties along the Build Alternative, flyers at local events through partnership with 14 community-based organizations (CBOs)*, city halls and libraries in the IOS communities, banners, e-blasts, about 200 SMS texts, 285 phone calls, newspaper legal ads, and social media ads for engaging people of color, low-income, limited English proficiency populations, and persons with disabilities. Approximately 28,280 flyers to save the date of the 4 public hearings were distributed to the general public along the project corridor, with an additional 23,200 flyers distributed to residents or businesses in the IOS station areas via transit intercepts and door-to-door business canvassing.
*List of 14 CBOs includes: Alma Family Services, Bike LA, Breathe SoCal, Day One, DESI, Heart of Compassion, Helpline Youth Counseling, LEEAF, Mundo Maya Foundation, Streets Are For Everyone, Strength Based Community Change, California Resource Services for Independent Living, MAOF, and Casa de La Familia.
The EA was made available to the public and agencies via the Project website (www.metro.net/projects/eastside_phase2/ <https://www.metro.net/projects/eastside_phase2/>). A web-based, user-friendly platform was used to present the EA document. The EA was published on the Federal Register (federalregister.gov/ <https://www.federalregister.gov/>). The Executive Summary of the EA was provided in both English and Spanish. Printed copies of the full EA document were available at the following locations:
1. Federal Transit Administration, Region 9 Southern California Office, 888 S Figueroa St Ste 440, Los Angeles, CA 90017
2. Metro Headquarters, Dorothy Peyton Gray Transportation Library, One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012
3. East Los Angeles Library, 4837 E 3rd Street, East Los Angeles, CA 90022
4. Rosewood Neighborhood Library, 5655 Jillson Street, Commerce, CA 90040
5. Chet Holifield County Library, 1060 S Greenwood Avenue, Montebello, CA 90640
To provide the community with relevant Project information that is not evaluated under NEPA, Metro published additional reports and resources on the Project website, including responses to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), an interactive StoryMap/Hub, and plans/profiles of the Build Alternative for the IOS.
Community Engagement and Public Participation
Metro implemented a comprehensive community engagement program during the NEPA Environmental Assessment phase to inform residents, businesses, stakeholders, and public agencies about the project and opportunities to participate in the federal environmental review process. Engagement efforts focused on increasing awareness of the Environmental Assessment, providing accessible and bilingual project information, revisiting concerns raised during previous project outreach activities, and ensuring meaningful public participation during the 30-day comment period. The following is a summary of the recent public meetings and community outreach efforts that helped inform the EA:
• January 2025 - Seven outreach events with community members (total 884 engagements) along the LPA;
• January and February 2025 - Four community meetings (total of 216 participants, consisting of three in-person meetings in East Los Angeles, Montebello, Commerce, and one virtual meeting) to inform the public of project updates, Metro’s intent to start the NEPA process, and discuss the NEPA schedule;
• March 2025 through May 2026- Partnership with 14 community-based organizations (CBOs) to continue increasing project awareness along the project corridor, including participation in about 23 local pop-up events, 162 targeted stakeholder briefings, and one community-based organization (CBO) meeting (with representatives from 9 CBOs) to notify CBO partners of Project updates;
Following the release of the EA on May 27, 2026, Metro hosted four public hearings in June 2026 to provide project updates and receive comments on the NEPA EA (a total of 189 attendees and 67 comments), consisting of three in-person meetings in East Los Angeles, Commerce, Montebello, and one virtual meeting. Court reporters and translators were present at all public hearings to receive spoken and/or written public comments. Both English and Spanish-speaking staff members and Spanish translators were present at all public hearings and outreach events to engage the public. Various exhibits, monitors, and interactive website tools were used to provide the public with an understanding of project design refinements and included the Metro project planning and engineering team to answer questions during the open house sessions, as well as a full presentation reviewing those design refinements. Public comments on the EA were accepted at the June 2026 public hearings and via mail, phone, email, and web form during the 30-day public comment period. Community feedback helped inform ongoing project refinements, including further evaluation of MSF options and continued efforts to minimize impacts to surrounding communities while advancing the project's mobility, equity, and sustainability goals.
At the conclusion of the 30-day public review period ending June 26, 2026, a total of approximately 140 comment submissions were received, which encompassed approximately 350 comments. Comments received on the EA are generally similar to the types of comments (a total of 301 submissions, which encompassed 958 comments) recorded in the Project’s Final EIR. Comments received on the EA during the formal public review period cover a wide range of topics, including strong support for the E-Line extension to Whittier from the general public and corridor cities; comments and suggestions related to project alignment and profile (underground vs. street level), alternative routes, station design, parking and multimodal access, landscaping, temporary construction impacts, permanent traffic impacts to residents and businesses due to traffic reconfiguration, truck access and detours; property acquisition and relocation for businesses, safety and security; and interest in ongoing community engagement as project design advances, transit-oriented development opportunities, public realm enhancements, and strategies to minimize impacts to surrounding communities. Metro will work with the FTA to prepare responses to comments received on the EA for inclusion in the final NEPA decision document by Fall 2026.
Funding Plan
The preliminary cost estimate for the IOS is approximately $7,902 millions in year 2022 dollars based on 15 percent design. This estimate will be refined upon completion of 30 percent Preliminary Engineering for the IOS in Fall 2026 and following FTA review during Project Development. The IOS funding plan was last presented to the Board in May 2024, when the Final EIR was certified. It relies on committed Measure M and Measure R sales tax revenues, other local sales tax sources (Proposition A and Proposition C), secured state funds, and additional state and federal funding to be secured. Groundbreaking of the IOS is assumed in Fiscal Year (FY) 2029 and opening in FY2035-2037. The remaining funding to be secured totals approximately $3,943.0 million for the IOS.
Notes:
STIP: State Transportation Improvement Program
TIRCP: Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program
SB1: Senate Bill 1
For the future 4.3-mile extension from Montebello to Whittier, the preliminary cost estimate is approximately $1.9 billion in year 2022 dollars based on 15 percent design. Based on preliminary cash flow forecasts, Measure M Cycle 2 funding is anticipated to be sufficient to cover both pre-construction and construction costs for further E-Line extension to Whittier, totaling approximately $4,989 million in year-of-expenditure (YOE) dollars, with groundbreaking scheduled for FY2053 and opening for revenue services by FY2058. Staff will continue the development of a funding strategy for the LPA and the full Project to address the funding gap. As the project progresses to key milestones, staff will continue coordinating with the Early Intervention Team to identify project risks and mitigation opportunities to control the project costs, including assessment of project delivery method options for future project phases, value engineering, working with local stakeholders to refine right-of-way acquisition assumptions, exercising cooperative agreements, streamlining the permitting process with cities, etc.
Metro Cost Benefit Analysis
In July 2025, the Board adopted a standardized Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) methodology framework for conducting data-driven evaluations of project alternatives, particularly in assessing benefits relative to the costs of alternatives. In this instance, a CBA was conducted for the three MSF alternatives as discussed in Attachment B. The CBA indicates that all MSF options are viable. MSF Site 3 performs best, with a score of 6.2 out of 7 points across qualitative and quantitative evaluation metrics, including various benefits and costs. MSF Site 2 scored 5.7 out of 7, and MSF Site 1 scored 5.3 out of 7 across the same metrics. MSF Site 3 (a 9-acre site in the City of Commerce) performs best due to its ability to deliver similar mobility, accessibility, safety, health and economic benefits, at a lower cost, shorter construction duration and lesser impact to adjacent properties and businesses.
Determination_Of_Safety_Impact
DETERMINATION OF SAFETY IMPACT
Recommended actions will not affect the safety of Metro customers and/or employees because this Project is in the planning phase, and no construction or operational safety impacts result from the recommended Board Actions.
Financial_Impact
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The FY 2027 budget includes approximately $5.29M in Project 460232 for professional services in Countywide Planning and Development to complete the final NEPA document. The source of funds comes from Measure R 35% Transit Capital fund, Measure M 35% Transit Construction fund, as well as state grant funds that have been awarded to the Project. These funds are not eligible for bus or rail operating expenses.
Equity_Platform
EQUITY PLATFORM
Board approval for the recommended actions is consistent with the goals and objectives outlined in the Metro Equity Platform Framework that identified that the Project traverses through Equity Focus Communities (EFCs) along the eastern portion of Los Angeles County. The full project alignment traverses six EFCs, which are in the Cities of Montebello, Commerce, Pico Rivera, Santa Fe Springs, Whittier, and unincorporated communities of East Los Angeles and West-Whittier Los Nietos. There are 2,281 transit-dependent households along the project alignment and 1,828 transit-dependent households along the IOS. This Project will benefit these EFCs and other communities along the eastern portion of Los Angeles County by providing access to a reliable light rail system and filling a current gap in high-quality transit services. When the eventual build-out of the project occurs, communities along the corridor will have access to the Metro regional network providing residents with critical transit service to access greater employment, health, and educational opportunities that include, but are not limited to, Whittier College, East Los Angeles College, Citadel Outlets, Historic Whittier Boulevard retail, and Presbyterian Intercommunity Hospital.
Vehicle_Miles_Traveled _Outcome
VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED OUTCOME
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and VMT per capita in Los Angeles County are lower than national averages, the lowest in the SCAG region, and on the lower end of VMT per capita statewide, with these declining VMT trends due in part to Metro’s significant investment in rail and bus transit.* Metro’s Board-adopted VMT reduction targets align with California’s statewide climate goals, including achieving carbon neutrality by 2045. To ensure continued progress, all Board items are assessed for their potential impact on VMT.
VMT was analyzed for this item through the VMT analysis completed for the Eastside Phase 2 Project Final EIR. The analysis identified a reduction in VMT due to the implementation of the project compared to conditions without the project, which demonstrates a benefit from the project and a less than significant impact from an environmental standpoint. Specifically, the VMT analysis in the EA identified a reduction in daily regional VMT of approximately 8,000 miles compared to the Horizon Year (2050) No Build Alternative conditions.
*Based on population estimates from the United States Census and VMT estimates from Caltrans’ Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) data between 2001-2019.
Implementation_of_Strategic_Plan_Goals
IMPLEMENTATION OF STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
The Project supports the following strategic plan goals identified in Vision 2028:
• Goal 1: Provide high-quality mobility options that enable people to spend less time traveling.
• Goal 3: Enhance communities and lives through mobility and access to opportunity and.
• Goal 4: Transform LA County through regional collaboration and national leadership
• Goal 5: Provide responsive, accountable, and trustworthy governance within the Metro organization.
Alternatives_Considered
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
The Board could consider not approving any of the recommended actions. However, this action is not recommended as it would jeopardize the Project schedule, delay progress toward revenue operations for the IOS by Year 2035-2037 per Measure M. Delaying the Project would delay these efforts and add cost.
Next_Steps
NEXT STEPS
Upon Board approval of the recommended actions, Metro will work with the FTA to publish the Final NEPA document, which will include the minor design refinements and the 9-acre MSF Site 3 in the City of Commerce as the Board-approved MSF Site for the IOS, with a FONSI anticipated by Fall 2026. Metro staff will amend the 2020 LRTP for the refined LPA and request amendments for the Project in the SCAG RTP/SCS. To be consistent with other projects’ successful progress and delivery, the Project staff will continue to coordinate with corridor cities and engage communities throughout the NEPA environmental process.
Attachments
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - NEPA EA Executive Summary
Attachment B - Cost-Benefit Analysis
Prepared_by
Prepared by: Emily Cadena, Transportation Planner, (213) 922-2876
Serena Lin, Senior Transportation Planner, (213) 922-2913
Maressa Sah, Manager, Transportation Planning, (213) 922-2462
Jill Liu, Senior Director, Countywide Planning & Development (213) 922-7220
Dolores Roybal, Deputy Executive Officer, Countywide Planning & Development, (213) 922-3024
Allison Yoh, Senior Executive Officer, Countywide Planning & Development, (213) 922-4812
David Mieger, Senior Executive Officer, Countywide Planning & Development,(213) 922-3040
Rafie Zamani, Senior Executive Officer, Program Management, (213) 418- 3140
Hector Guerrero, Senior Executive Officer, Rail Operations, (213) 418-3003
Lorena Sanchez, Manager, Community Relations, (213) 922-2401
Reviewed_By
Reviewed by: Ray Sosa, Chief Planning Officer, (213) 547-4274
Conan Cheung, Chief Operations Officer, (213) 418-3034
Timothy Lindholm, Chief Program Management Officer,
(213) 922-7297
