File #: 2018-0135   
Type: Motion / Motion Response Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 3/20/2018 In control: Planning and Programming Committee
On agenda: 5/16/2018 Final action:
Title: RECEIVE AND FILE response to Motion 36 approved at the October 2017 Board Meeting.
Sponsors: Planning and Programming Committee
Indexes: Bicycling, Board approved a Motion, El Monte, Guidelines, Housing, Long Beach, Metro Commute Services, Motion / Motion Response, Outreach, Partnerships, Pilot studies, Program, Program management, Purchasing, Ridesharing, Santa Monica, Shelia Kuehl, South Coast Air Quality Management District, Southern California Association Of Governments, Strategic planning, Students, Surveys, Sustainable transportation, Telecommuting, Tourism, Transit Oriented Development, Transit Pass, Transportation Demand Management, Travel demand management, Vehicle miles of travel, Vehicle sharing, Walking, Work trips, Zoning
Attachments: 1. Attachment A - Board Motion 36, 2. Attachment B - Regional Commuter Benefit Program: LA County/SF Bay Area, 3. Attachment C - Excerpts: 2018 Metro State Legislative Program
Related files: 2017-0715, 2018-0799
Date Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsAudio
No records to display.
Meeting_Body
PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE
MAY 16, 2018

Subject
SUBJECT: TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT

Action
ACTION: RECEIVE AND FILE

Heading
RECOMMENDATION

Title
RECEIVE AND FILE response to Motion 36 approved at the October 2017 Board Meeting.

Issue
ISSUE

In October 2017 the Board approved Motion 36, directing staff to develop a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) action plan around several elements. Given the comprehensive nature of the task, and appreciating the complexity of existing TDM planning and regulatory environment, staff prepared an assessment of current conditions as a baseline for developing recommendations that respond to the Motion's specific directives.

That Phase One analysis was presented as a Board Box and sent to Board members on March 7, 2018. It is referenced throughout this report, and can be accessed at http://boardarchives.metro.net/BoardBox/2018/180307_Transportation_Demand_Management_Preparatory_Motion_36_Response.pdf. The original Motion is included as Attachment A. This Board Report represents the second phase response to the Board Motion, and addresses the elements of Motion 36.

Discussion
DISCUSSION

Structure of this report: Relationship to Phase One

The Phase One assessment provided a detailed inventory of current Metro activities in the area of TDM. Primarily, it clarified Metro's roles and responsibilities with those of local jurisdictions, South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), and public and private sector employers - an important step given TDM's multi-sectoral nature and dispersed authorities. Distinctions among existing authorities were mapped, as well as an understanding of both long imposed and relatively new statutory requirements that generate TDM-related actions today. Motivating this background analysis was the need to identify the many factors impacting the Motion's directive subsection (C) to "Recommend ho...

Click here for full text