File #: 2018-0187   
Type: Policy Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 4/5/2018 In control: Planning and Programming Committee
On agenda: 7/18/2018 Final action:
Title: ADOPT the revised Measure R and new Measure M Cost Management Policy (Attachment A).
Sponsors: Planning and Programming Committee
Indexes: Budgeting, Capital Project, Guidelines, Measure M, Measure M Cost Management Policy, Measure R, Measure R and Measure M Unified Cost Management Policy, Measure R Cost Management Process and Policy, Policy, Program management
Attachments: 1. Attachment A - Revised Cost Management Policy for Measure R and M Projects
Related files: 2018-0502
Date Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsAudio
No records to display.

Meeting_Body

PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE

JULY 18, 2018

 

Subject

SUBJECT:                     MEASURE R AND MEASURE M

COST MANAGEMENT POLICY

 

Action

ACTION:                     APPROVE RECOMMENDATION

 

Heading

RECOMMENDATION

 

Title

ADOPT the revised Measure R and new Measure M Cost Management Policy (Attachment A).

 

Issue

ISSUE

 

The center of the expenditure plans for both Measure R and Measure M is the significant capital project portfolio.  Managing a mix of projects - either several large or “mega” capital projects with multi-year timelines, or a multitude of small capital projects - comes with inherent uncertainties that can affect costs.  To effectively manage the complex capital program, the Board adopted a cost management policy for Measure R; with the recent passage of Measure M, an update of the cost management policy is in order.

 

The revised Measure R and Measure M Cost Management Policy (Policy) updates the original Measure R Cost Management Policy to provide consistency between the existing policy and the Measure M Cost Management Policy in the Measure M Guidelines.  The updated Policy also addresses ambiguity in the application of the Policy with projects that are between development phases.

 

Background

BACKGROUND

 

The Metro Board adopted the original Measure R Cost Management Policy in 2011 to help document and address potential cost increases for the capital program.  The Policy identifies key events in a project’s development when costs are to be evaluated and steps to address cost increases, including value engineering, local agency funding, shorter segmentation, cost reductions to other projects, and prioritizing the funding and scheduling of projects.

 

In 2015, the Metro Board amended the Policy to include regional facilities. Regional facilities are generally defined as airports, seaports, and Union Station. This amendment allowed Metro projects within the boundary of those facilities to be exempted from corridor and subregional cost reduction requirements.

 

Staff has applied the Policy to a number of potential cost increases since 2011 in both the Measure R highway and transit program.  The Policy has been successful in providing clarity and transparency to the Board, Metro staff, and the public. 

 

The Metro Board approved the Measure M Guidelines in 2017, which included a Cost Management Policy for Measure M.  However, there has not been a unified cost management policy which applies to both Measure R and Measure M projects.  Given the magnitude of investment in the coming years, staff believes it is appropriate to return to the Board to present an updated Policy that can better assist in the management of the capital program.

 

...Discussion

DISCUSSION

 

Summary of Revisions

 

The major focus of the update is to clarify as much as possible how and when the Policy is applied to projects.  For example, a definition of “Transit or Highway Corridor” is included that clarifies the subregion where offsetting cost reductions would be evaluated.  Additionally, Metro staff has amended the Policy to include both highway and transit projects in all steps.

 

Another significant change is the addition of a new review milestone.  The new milestone requires updates to cost estimates resulting from specific actions (e.g., approved final environmental documents; completion of 30% design cost related to Measure M 3% local agency contribution policy).  This will serve to ensure that public reporting and documentation of project specific costs are consistent throughout the life of the project since a number of projects are moving through the planning process. It is critical to maintain a clear and transparent process for documenting cost assumptions and estimates.

 

Lastly, staff further recommends updates to the Policy to incorporate the cost management policy from the Measure M Guidelines in order to provide consistency and added specificity.  Going forward staff believes these additions and clarifications will strengthen the Policy and allow the Board to continue to make informed decisions.

 

Determination_Of_Safety_Impact

DETERMINATION OF SAFETY IMPACT

 

Approval of this item will have no impact on safety standards for Metro.

 

Financial_Impact

FINANCIAL IMPACT

 

Adoption of the revised Measure R and Measure M Cost Management Policy is intended to improve Metro’s financial management and cost controls.  This update further reinforces tools the Metro Board and staff have to address cost increases.

 

 

Impact to Budget

 

There is no impact to the FY 18 Budget.

 

Alternatives_Considered

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED

 

The Board could elect not to make the recommended revisions to the Policy.  Metro staff recommends against this approach as the revised Policy addresses some omissions which limit the ability to manage and control costs.  The omissions addressed include clarification on milestones for project evaluation and providing more consistency between the existing policies.

 

Next_Steps

NEXT STEPS

 

Approval of this item will allow staff to apply the new Policy going forward and will be in place for the update to the Long Range Transportation Plan and other future planning efforts.

 

Attachments

ATTACHMENTS

 

Attachment A - Revised Unified Cost Management Policy for Measure R and Measure M Projects

 

Prepared_by

Prepared by: Steven Mateer, Manager, Countywide Planning & Development, (213) 922-2504

Craig Hoshijima, DEO, Countywide Planning & Development, (213) 418-3384

Laurie Lombardi, SEO, Countywide Planning & Development, (213) 418-3251

 

Reviewed_By

Reviewed by: Therese W. McMillan, Chief Planning Officer, (213) 922-7077