File #: 2021-0540   
Type: Informational Report Status: Filed
File created: 8/3/2021 In control: Operations, Safety, and Customer Experience Committee
On agenda: 10/21/2021 Final action: 10/21/2021
Title: RECEIVE AND FILE Office of the Inspector General (OIG) Report on Audit of Metro Transit Security Services Performance for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020.
Sponsors: Operations, Safety, and Customer Experience Commit
Indexes: Audit, Board approved a Motion, Budgeting, Contracts, Informational Report, Key Performance Indicator, Law enforcement, Long Beach Police Department, Los Angeles Police Department, Los Angeles Sheriffs Department, Payment, Police, Safety, Security, Strategic planning
Attachments: 1. Attachment A - Audit of Metro Transit Security Services Performance, 2. Presentation
Meeting_Body
OPERATIONS, SAFETY, AND CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE COMMITTE
EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
OCTOBER 21, 2021

Subject
SUBJECT: OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL (OIG) REPORT ON AUDIT OF METRO TRANSIT SECURITY SERVICES PERFORMANCE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2020
Action
ACTION: RECEIVE AND FILE

Heading
RECOMMENDATION

Title
RECEIVE AND FILE Office of the Inspector General (OIG) Report on Audit of Metro Transit Security Services Performance for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020.
Issue
ISSUE

On February 23, 2017, the Metro Board passed a motion directing the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) to conduct an annual audit of each law enforcement services contract to determine how key performance indicators measure up against actual performance metrics. The audit is to ensure that Metro is receiving the services it is paying for.

Background
BACKGROUND

In 2017, LACMTA (Metro) awarded three separate five-year firm fixed unit rate contracts to the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD), the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (LASD), and the Long Beach Police Department (LBPD) for transit law enforcement services to support day-to-day operations across Metro's entire service area. Metro also directly employs transit security officers who perform fare checks and bus/rail patrolling, as overseen by the Systems Security & Law Enforcement (SSLE) Department.


Discussion
DISCUSSION

The report discusses the following:
A. Follow-up on Prior Audit Recommendations
B. Use of Contract Funds
C. Review of Billings
D. Monitoring and Oversight
E. Adherence to Contract Requirements
F. Use of GPS Information on Mobile Phone Validators
G. Metro's Access to Video from Police Body Cameras

CONCLUSION
Contracted Law Enforcement Agencies
We found for the areas covered in this audit that the three law enforcement agencies for the most part, provided transit security services in accordance with contract requirements. However, as discussed in this report, we...

Click here for full text